ARTBA Urges EPA Not to Classify Coal Ash as ’Hazardous’ Material

Fri September 10, 2010 - National Edition
Construction Equipment Guide


A U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposal to regulate coal ash as a “hazardous waste” could make concrete more expensive and less durable, thus increasing the costs and environmental footprint of key transportation improvement projects, according to Nick Goldstein, vice president of environmental and regulatory affairs of the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA).

“Every element of the transportation construction process, from the suppliers of concrete to the contractors who handle construction materials would be affected by the stigma of a ’hazardous waste’ label for coal ash,” Goldstein said at an Aug. 30 EPA hearing. “Specifically, because of the increased expense of handling a ’hazardous waste,’ the producers of coal ash would be resistant to continue providing it to concrete manufacturers.”

The transportation sector’s use of coal ash has been an environmental success story, Goldstein said.

“According to EPA’s own data, coal ash accounts for between 15 and 30 percent of the cement in concrete. Further, EPA has noted using coal ash at this level results in annual greenhouse gas reductions in concrete production of between 12.5 and 25 tons and an annual reduction in oil consumption between 26.8 and 53.6 million barrels.”

In 2008 alone, more than 12.5 million tons of coal ash was used in the production of concrete. Goldstein noted a variety of transportation projects, including:

• Colorado, where the use of coal ash in 2008 reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 19,500 tons;

• Indiana, where the state department of transportation is able to use an average of 42 percent of the coal ash generated on recycled construction material;

• North Carolina, where the use of coal ash is saving $5 to $10 million annually on transportation projects;

• Texas, where the annual savings from coal ash is estimated at $16 million; and

• Minnesota, where coal ash was used in the concrete for the new I-35 bridge replacement.

Goldstein told EPA officials that on four separate occasions, in 1988, 1993, 1999 and 2000, the agency found that coal ash did not warrant regulation as a “hazardous” waste. He said there has been no new scientific information presented since these prior reviews that would warrant EPA’s reaching a different conclusion now.

“We take great pride in the environmental successes the transportation sector has been able to achieve through the recycling of coal ash,” Goldstein concluded. “ARTBA urges the EPA to allow these achievements to continue and even grow by rejecting the option of regulating coal ash as a ’hazardous waste’.”




Today's top stories

WBEs Leave Mark On Kansas City Airport

Ditch Witch MT26 Microtrencher Provides Deepest Cut Option for Fiber Job Sites

Caterpillar Surpasses $3B Tonnes Hauled Autonomously by Cat Command for Hauling Trucks

Crews Construct Bridge Offsite, Float It Into Place

All-New Brandt Coupler Built for Safety, Optimized for Deere

VIDEO: Volvo CE Delivers Its Version of the Factory 4 Tomorrow

Brass Knuckle Splash Goggle/Face Shield-In-One is Force to Be Reckoned With

Brooks Breaks Ground in Sparta, Wisconsin








ceg-logo ceg-logo ceg-logo ceg-logo ceg-logo