Create a CEG Account  /  CEG Login



Dakota Access Pipeline Suit on Hold During Related Dispute

A lawsuit from two Sioux tribes seeking suing to stop the Dakota Access oil pipeline was put on hold while a separate but related court battle over the project plays out.

- National Edition
Blake Nicholson

Dallas-based pipeline developer Energy Transfer Partners is asking U.S. District Judge James Boasberg in Washington, D.C., to rule that the company received proper permission from the Army in July to lay pipe under a Missouri River reservoir in North Dakota - the last remaining chunk of construction for the $3.8 billion project.
Dallas-based pipeline developer Energy Transfer Partners is asking U.S. District Judge James Boasberg in Washington, D.C., to rule that the company received proper permission from the Army in July to lay pipe under a Missouri River reservoir in North Dakota - the last remaining chunk of construction for the $3.8 billion project.

BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) A lawsuit from two Sioux tribes seeking suing to stop the Dakota Access oil pipeline was put on hold while a separate but related court battle over the project plays out.

Dallas-based pipeline developer Energy Transfer Partners is asking U.S. District Judge James Boasberg in Washington, D.C., to rule that the company received proper permission from the Army in July to lay pipe under a Missouri River reservoir in North Dakota - the last remaining chunk of construction for the $3.8 billion project. The Army earlier this month said more study was needed in light of concerns from the Standing Rock Sioux that the pipeline could threaten cultural sites and drinking water.

Energy Transfer Partners disputes the tribe's claims and says the pipeline is safe. The pipeline would carry North Dakota oil 1,200 miles through the Dakotas and Iowa to a shipping point in Illinois.

The Standing Rock Sioux and the Cheyenne River Sioux are challenging federal pipeline permits at numerous water crossings. The tribes earlier this month said they were willing to put their claims on hold until the fight between ETP and the Army is resolved, and Boasberg in a ruling dated Friday agreed to do so.

One reason for delaying the tribal challenge is to enable the court to focus on the Missouri River crossing dispute, which has stalled the project that was supposed to be done by the end of this year.

"Holding the tribes' claims in abeyance will serve the interests of judicial economy by enabling Standing Rock, Cheyenne River, and the Corps and the court to focus on resolving the (river crossing matter) on an expedited basis," said the joint proposal from the tribes and the Army Corps of Engineers that Boasberg approved.

Boasberg earlier this month gave the government until Jan. 6 to file its opposition to ETP's request. Oral arguments won't be held until at least February.


Today's top stories

VIDEO: Abernethy Relies On John Deere, Strong Dealer Partnership

Won't You Be My Neighbor — Central Crane & HIS Partner on Project

AED Foundation Releases 2026 Technician Shortage Research Report

Joey Martin Auctioneers Holds Sale in Carrollton

Volvo Trucks Launches 'Lock and Leave' Software Updates

Bell Trucks America Adds Hills Machinery as New Dealer in N.C., S.C., Va.

Beam Failure May Have Triggered Old Town Bridge Collapse

BOMAG BC 473-5 and BC 573-5 Series Compactors Get New Cummins Engines





×

Stay Ahead of the Market

Get weekly equipment news, auction updates, and dealer insights — trusted by thousands of industry professionals.