Construction Equipment Guide
470 Maryland Drive
Fort Washington, PA 19034
800-523-2200
Mon August 21, 2006 - National Edition
A diverse group of construction associations, representing owners, design and construction professionals, and insurance and surety companies continue to actively discuss the development and promotion of standard construction contracts. The associations are uniting around the idea that the industry is better served by balanced contracts that are actively supported by all.
Contracts with widespread buy-in will save needless transactional time and money by eliminating the need to repetitively negotiate one-sided terms, according to the associations.
“All parties in a construction project deserve to work under a fair contract — one that they have confidence in because each of their respective associations had a true seat at the drafting table,” said Stephen E. Sandherr, CEO of the Associated General Contractors of America (AGC).
The construction industry groups have been in discussions for a year-and-a-half regarding the content of construction contracts and a business model to adequately support this effort. The groups recently decided to renew their commitment to work collaboratively on producing and promoting consensus contracts.
Associations actively participating involved is discussions include:
• Associated General Contractors of America (AGC);
• Associated Specialty Contractors Inc. (ASC);
• American Subcontractors Association Inc. (ASA);
• Construction Industry Round Table (CIRT);
• Construction Owners Association of America (COAA);
• Construction Users Round Table (CURT);
• Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA);
• National Association of State Facilities Administrators (NASFA);
• National Association of Surety Bond Producers (NASBP); and
• Surety & Fidelity Association of America (SFAA).
“The drafting process has been the best committee approach that I have ever participated in. I look forward to continuing this process to conclusion and providing contracts that will allow users to focus more time and energy on contract results and successful outcomes, rather than battling over biased contract terms,” said Bob Bourg of NASFA.
“It is in the enlightened self-interest of all parties — owners, design professions, and general and subcontractors — to draft fair contracts,” said Greg Sizemore, executive vice-president of CURT.
Jack Mumma, president of COAA commented, “At the end of the day, we all have the same interest: to build an outstanding project that benefits everyone.”
The inclusive group hoped to reach out to organizations that already create contract documents as well as other associations that may want to join the effort.